A REPEATABLE METHOD
How to use it
- Choose the task plane: desk, floor or vertical surface. Select lux and check the range multiplier; perform zero adjustment only as the model manual specifies before starting.
- Keep the unobstructed sensor face parallel to the chosen task plane. A vertical surface needs a vertical sensing plane, not an upward-facing desk reading; do not aim at the brightest lamp instead.
- Avoid casting a shadow or reflecting light onto the sensor with your body, then wait for the reading to settle. A remote sensor or timer hold, if provided, lets you step away.
- Label a repeatable grid, including darker edges. Record each position, height, sensor orientation, time, lamp/dimmer state and daylight conditions; repeat the same points for a comparison.
- Average only comparable points and compare them with the applicable local guidance for the activity.
INTERPRET THE MEASUREMENT
How to read the result
- Lux is lumens per square metre arriving at the sensor; it is not the total output printed on a lamp.
- Daylight can change within minutes, so before-and-after comparisons should use similar conditions or be repeated after dark.
- Cosine response and spectral response affect accuracy, especially with oblique light and unusual LED spectra.
- Arithmetic example, not a lighting target: four measurements representing equal-area cells are 100, 200, 300 and 400 lx. Their sample mean is 250 lx; the lowest measured value is still 100 lx, not 250 lx everywhere. Do not mix different planes or daylight conditions, and do not use an unweighted mean for unequal-area cells. These sample readings do not prove compliance or locate the true minimum between points.
TROUBLESHOOT THE METHOD
Common problems and what to check
Readings change when the meter is rotated or moved slightly.
Keep the sensing plane and height fixed, remove your shadow and use a grid rather than chasing one favorable point.
The desk average is acceptable but work still feels uncomfortable.
Check glare, screen reflections, contrast, flicker and color rendering. A lux value alone cannot diagnose visual comfort.
A phone app disagrees with the meter.
Phone sensors and diffusers vary and are often optimized for screen brightness. Use the phone for trends unless it has been compared with a suitable meter.
STOP BEFORE THE HAZARD
Safety boundary
- Do not stare into high-intensity lamps or expose skin and eyes to UV sources during a measurement.
- Isolate electrical fixtures before opening or repositioning them and use safe access for high luminaires.
- Workplace and emergency-lighting compliance requires the correct regional method, grid and calibrated equipment.
SMART BUYING GUIDE
What to look for when choosing
- For home comparisons, prioritize a separate cosine-corrected sensor, sensible low-light resolution and stable repeatability.
- Data logging is valuable for daylight studies; very high maximum range is rarely useful in an ordinary room.
- Pay for calibration documentation only when the result supports professional or compliance work.
Types of tool
Best for: Rough relative comparisons after checking consistency.
Best for: Quick room surveys and repeatable household checks.
Best for: Precise positioning, long studies and professional records.
Common functions
Worth paying more for
- A good cosine-corrected remote sensor
- Repeatability and calibration for professional work
- Logging when daylight or schedules matter
Usually not worth the extra cost
- Extreme outdoor range for normal rooms
- Decorative color screens without better sensors
- App connectivity when measurements cannot be exported usefully
Sources & instructions
- NIST SP 330, section 2: illuminance in lux and luminous flux in lumens
- HIOKI: lux-meter principles, spectral sensitivity and cosine correction
- HIOKI FT3424: avoiding operator shadows with a remote sensor or timer hold (model example)
AI-generated topic illustration; do not use the depicted scale for measurements.
